Exploring the Influencing Factors and Validity of Formative Assessment in Online Learning
Yan Liu
Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5344-7565
Hongfeng Zhang
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macao, China.
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3485-3189
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v9i4.4288
Keywords: Assessment functions, Asynchronous interaction, Formative assessment, Grounded theory, Online formative assessment validity model, Online learning.
Abstract
Online learning is increasingly popular as the pandemic spreads around the globe. This shift in learning preferences presents opportunities and difficulties for the assessment of learning. As a method of assessment used throughout the learning process, formative assessment can encourage students' interest in learning, enhance learning outcomes, support teachers' strategic planning and maximize teaching results. However, the effectiveness of online formative assessment has been questioned. This study uses a qualitative research methodology based on Grounded Theory to analyze the validity of formative assessment in online learning by examining the factors unique to online learning that affect it. After reviewing previous studies and interviewing 45 online learners, this paper three-level-coded the sources and analyzed them. Findings show that the validity is influenced by the lack of functional alienation caused by the effects of the subject's emotional game and adaptability, objective environment and technology and poor interaction. To help implement formative assessment in real classroom practices, two models were established based on the findings, namely the Formative Assessment Model (FAM) and Online Formative Assessment Validity Model (OFAV). This study asks about the influence factors and explores how much the validity of formative assessment shows in online practice, and provides new feasible ideas and suggestions for the future development of the field of educational assessment.